Sudan in particular has enjoyed a great deal of support from China: even in the midst of the worst of alleged genocides in Darfur, Beijing's representative made sure that any condemnation of Khartoum was so watered down as to be ineffective. The United Nations, theoretically the great International leveller but more often an impotent old guard dog, has also been used by China as a means to protect the sovereignty of her allies (or protect their Beijing-friendly regimes and Chinese assets, depending on your perspective). ‘Gifts’ from State Owned Enterprises (SOE's) to poor African nations have taken forms as diverse as roads and hospitals and have curried much favour amongst the more questionably ‘legitimate’ despots of that continent. Tamara Renee Shie, in her excellent essay ‘ Beijing's Island Fever,’ tells us, for example, that China has been giving support to pro-Chinese candidates in democratic elections in the Pacific Islands for years. Politically motivated donations have been a factor of China's chequebook diplomacy for at least a decade now. So, is this the beginning of a new interventionist policy from Beijing? Arguably, this had already begun. On the other hand, both powers lack other allies with the same economic clout, and are acutely aware of the necessity of keeping Beijing happy, regardless of a change in philosophy. Were China to change tack and take a more humanitarian stance, it would fundamentally threaten the supplies of Iranian oil (approximately 15 percent of China's annual imports) and the gas pipeline through Burma that feeds them so much of their energy. The Communist Party will be well aware of the fact that two of its most significant allies, Iran and Burma, are both international pariahs that face constant challenges to their authority from within. Just $5 a month.Īnd this is something that Beijing can’t afford if it is to keep its reputation as a non-interventionist power intact. After all, speaking directly with a force that’s openly challenging the rule of the acknowledged government is tantamount to legitimizing the rebel's cause.Įnjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. At the very least, China will no longer be able to claim the moral high ground when the Dalai Lama visits Washington, and would only have limited cause for complaint when ‘anti-harmony elements’ such as Liu Xiaobo are recognized for their contribution to dissent in the Middle Kingdom. Get the Newsletterīut does China really know which way the wind is blowing? More importantly, why do they care? After all, the Five Principles counsel non-involvement in other's affairs and a change now would set a dangerous precedent for future diplomatic engagement. Get briefed on the story of the week, and developing stories to watch across the Asia-Pacific. For the powers of NATO, China's volte-face is proof that their strategy is working. This engagement is a sign that Beijing wishes to ensure they are backing the right horse. China, in holding talks with the rebels, is practically acknowledging the inevitability of the downfall of the Gaddafi regime. Interventionists like to see this as a vindication and a strong indicator that the balance of power is shifting in the Libyan conflict. China has traditionally only engaged with the legitimately recognized government of other states on political issues, so why the sudden change? Which is why it was so surprising to observers when the Chinese government announced that it would receive envoys from the anti-government rebels currently fighting in Libya. It serves to reassure potential friends of non-hostile intentions by letting them know that their sovereignty and territory will be respected, and that China expects precisely the same in return. The Five Principles send a message to potential allies and enemies alike: this is how we do business this is how we expect you to do your business with us. And, although originally conceived with India and Burma in mind, they have allowed Beijing to actively and continuously engage some of the most suspect regimes under the politically laudable but morally dubious guise of a ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy that can see an ally commit what many describe as genocide even as Chinese companies explore oil fields only a few miles away. The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence have underpinned Chinese diplomacy for more than 50 years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |